Court allows POM to continue fight against Coke
DAILY NEWS New York News Politics Sports Entertainment Opinion Living Autos Search Events Health Homes Food Horoscopes Education Comics Games Living Pics Fashion Pics Blogs
Court allows POM to continue with lawsuit against Coke 4-chlorodehydromethyltestosteron In a reversal of the lower courts' decisions, the Supreme Court ruled Thursday that Coca Cola's Pomegranate Blueberry Minute Maid is misleading because 99% of it is apple and grape juice. But POM isn't without litigation itself. THE ASSOCIATED PRESS
Matt Rourke/AP The Supreme Court on Thursday sided with juice maker Pom Wonderful in its long running false advertising dispute with Coca Cola, a decision that could "Comprar Gh Jintropin" open the door to more litigation against food makers for deceptive labeling.
Coca Cola's version of pomegranate juice is not quite the real thing, and a competitor has another chance to prove it in court.
The Supreme Court on Thursday sided with juice maker Pom Wonderful Dianabol Gyno Prevention in its long running false advertising dispute with the Coca Cola Co., a decision that could open the door to Dianabol Atlas-Dom more litigation against food makers for deceptive labeling.
The justices ruled 8 0 that Pom can go forward with a lawsuit alleging the label on a "Pomegranate Blueberry" beverage offered by Coke's Minute Maid unit is misleading because 99 percent of the drink is apple and grape juice.
Lower courts had ruled in favor of Coke because the label conforms to the law and to Food and Drug Administration rules. But the Supreme Court reversed, finding that the juice label may technically comply with FDA rules but may still mislead consumers for different reasons.
Justice Anthony Kennedy, who wrote the court's opinion, appeared to have telegraphed his position back in April when he said at oral argument that the label even misled him into thinking the drink was mostly pomegranate juice. His opinion Thursday focused on the juice's details, noting that the product contained only 0.3 percent pomegranate juice, 0.2 percent blueberry juice and 0.1 percent raspberry juice.
Kennedy said the law governing regulation of food and "Oxandrolone Powder India" drug labels does not preclude a competitor to sue under a different law for unfair competition based on false or misleading claims. He said federal food and trademark laws complement each other in the regulation of misleading labels.
Justice "Comprar Gh Jintropin" Stephen Breyer took no part in the case.
The court also rejected Coke's argument that allowing a deceptive labeling claim would interfere with national uniformity under FDA laws. Kennedy said Congress chose to allow challenges under trademark law "to enforce a national policy to ensure fair competition."
Pom, "Anabola Steroider Norge Lagligt" which faces deceptive advertising claims of its own, filed its lawsuit against Coke in 2008 after it began losing market share to Minute Maid's "Pomegranate Blueberry Flavored Blend of 5 Juices" drink. The drink's label shows the words "Pomegranate Blueberry" in much larger type than the rest of the phrase and includes a prominent picture of large pomegranate set among other fruits.
AP The justices ruled 8 0 that Pom can go forward with a lawsuit alleging the label on a "Pomegranate Blueberry" beverage offered by Coke's Minute Maid unit is misleading because 99 percent of the drink consists of apple and grape juice. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled in favor of Coke, finding that food labeling laws preclude private lawsuits under trademark law.
The food and beverage industry had expressed concerns that a ruling for Pom would lead to greater uncertainty about labeling requirements and lead to a flurry of new lawsuits.
Coke's lawyer claimed during oral arguments that it would be a "logistical nightmare" for food companies to have to change labels in response to every private lawsuit. The beverage giant says the federal government, not competitors, should be enforcing uniform label requirements.
Kennedy acknowledged that allowing trademark claims to be decided by judges and juries in courts around the country "may give rise to some variation in outcome." But he said "this is the means Congress chose to enforce a national policy to ensure fair competition."
Claudia Vetesi, a San Francisco attorney specializing in false advertising class action lawsuits, said the decision could lead to an increase in "business to business litigation" over food labeling.
"Now a company could make sure its label complies with FDA regulation, but that doesn't mean they won't get sued," said Vetesi, who is not involved in the case. "This chips away at the primacy of the FDA."
In a separate case, the federal government has filed a deceptive advertising case against Pom for claiming that its pomegranate juice can treat or prevent heart disease, prostate cancer and other illnesses. Circuit.
Related Stories Coke to drop controversial ingredient from all of its drinks
Sugar should be 5% of calories: WHO
Editor's Picks Lenox Hill Hospital staffer starts hat program for patients Patients at Lenox Hill Hospital are staying warm and cozy this winter thanks to a heartwarming idea from one of its own.
Mount Sinai St. Luke's Hospital is set to take a load off MOUNT SINAI St. Luke's Hospital is prepping to shed a little weight.
Rejecting the Twinkies: US purchases of packaged sweets down Americans aren't so sweet on boxes of cookies anymore at least according to a new research.
Christmas wish comes true for Bronx girl Christmas came early for a little Bronx girl with a big Deca Durabolin Jak Brac wish.